Marcel Duchamp, artist, or an anthropologist? | Art and degrowth
Home About Us Manifesto Art and decrease Entries Categories Cafe, philosophical essays The King is naked reasoned Reviews Sections artistic Architecture and Urbanism Film Literature Music Painting Photography Sculpture and collaborates Contacts Events
The art does not tend towards their own destruction? This effort toward nothing is what animates all contemporary art? To appreciate it is essential to question the significance of the artist boeing space without a doubt the most emblematic of modernity: Marcel Duchamp. His work suggests Alain Boton (which first signed boeing space himself "the anonymous artist") should be read as a rebus. A puzzle that tells us that, behind his "art" is just a sociological experience. It is "the observer who makes the picture," wrote Duchamp. From here the translation boeing space of the riddle: "If the sociological law that takes an object created by an artist becomes a work of art if it is rejected by a majority scandalized at the beginning, boeing space so that an active minority can caress self-love in the direction of the hair re-enabling law is really a 'scientific', then my urinal, despite not having any of the attributes that, in 1913, are considered as characteristic of a work of art, it will become an artistic masterpiece when he began his career boeing space with a radical rejection boeing space and known to all. " Where the author suggesting that Duchamp has mystified the art world, says that he reveals the truth: the vanity and emptiness. To discuss. Alain Caille
This is the question that I ask myself and the readers of the magazine's MAUSS can perhaps help me solve. I'm going to briefly explain this thesis, knowing that argument is based on a very rigid and thus rejectable, exposed in a work entitled "Marcel Duchamp saw himself, or almost," which rightly struggling to find space in the public debate because it exposes aspects unedifying to modernity. boeing space (In fact, it is not yet published).
Everyone knows, at least by reputation, Marcel Duchamp, boeing space Dada artist who promoted a urinal to the status of a masterpiece of the twentieth century. The concept of the readymade attributed to him today is inescapable and still fuels the majority of contemporary creations.
One of the last meetings that bring together his criticism was immeasurable fortune entitled "To each his own Duchamp," testifying in this way that his work is now considered as a Spanish hotel where everyone brings his obsessions. boeing space So there is an alchemist Duchamp, Duchamp, a Christian, an apostle boeing space of Duchamp's sexual liberation, a oulipiano and Pataphysician Duchamp, Duchamp's a fan of popular science in a playful, a follower of Duchamp's laziness on the line by Paul Lafargue ... etc.. His work is therefore designed in order to elicit multiple interpretations and its enigmatic form derives boeing space from this desire to be a sort of dream catchers of all fantasies. What is not false, as we shall see. In fact, Duchamp has actually created the set of its objects, its "things" as he called them, with the aim of causing testosterone critic virtuous but this feature is inscribed in an overall project that is not what d ' an artist but that of an anthropologist who wants to prove scientifically what this rests the famous "judgment of taste" that after Hume and Kant is the object of aesthetic philosophy. Duchamp has mystified the "art world." Or rather, it is the author's first life-size experiment in the history of the human sciences aims to show the sociological laws.
It is said of a work or of a person who is an enigma when the underlying meaning can not be understood in a certain and therefore causes of multiple interpretations, all equally conclusive. Paradoxically, it also defines enigma wit which is to create from scratch a problem that has a solution only verifiable in order to test the intelligence and tenacity of a person. Two very different ways of using this word. The ambiguity, however, is more evident in the first case, where we use the word enigma for free from the obligation to find a permanent solution while the second will be used in reverse to insist on this obligation.
Presented three small drawings like a ball, a Cupid and a hedge of garden boeing space with two children and ask them what they think. The first person who knows of the existence of this wit that is the riddle, tell very quickly "boulanger", second, that does not know at this game you will launch into a digression aesthetics.
- I really like the chubby little angel ... the designer must be a lover of classical art, maybe even a believer ... On the other hand, the circle is a symbol of perfection, this must be the representation of God ...
- Absolutely not - p
Home About Us Manifesto Art and decrease Entries Categories Cafe, philosophical essays The King is naked reasoned Reviews Sections artistic Architecture and Urbanism Film Literature Music Painting Photography Sculpture and collaborates Contacts Events
The art does not tend towards their own destruction? This effort toward nothing is what animates all contemporary art? To appreciate it is essential to question the significance of the artist boeing space without a doubt the most emblematic of modernity: Marcel Duchamp. His work suggests Alain Boton (which first signed boeing space himself "the anonymous artist") should be read as a rebus. A puzzle that tells us that, behind his "art" is just a sociological experience. It is "the observer who makes the picture," wrote Duchamp. From here the translation boeing space of the riddle: "If the sociological law that takes an object created by an artist becomes a work of art if it is rejected by a majority scandalized at the beginning, boeing space so that an active minority can caress self-love in the direction of the hair re-enabling law is really a 'scientific', then my urinal, despite not having any of the attributes that, in 1913, are considered as characteristic of a work of art, it will become an artistic masterpiece when he began his career boeing space with a radical rejection boeing space and known to all. " Where the author suggesting that Duchamp has mystified the art world, says that he reveals the truth: the vanity and emptiness. To discuss. Alain Caille
This is the question that I ask myself and the readers of the magazine's MAUSS can perhaps help me solve. I'm going to briefly explain this thesis, knowing that argument is based on a very rigid and thus rejectable, exposed in a work entitled "Marcel Duchamp saw himself, or almost," which rightly struggling to find space in the public debate because it exposes aspects unedifying to modernity. boeing space (In fact, it is not yet published).
Everyone knows, at least by reputation, Marcel Duchamp, boeing space Dada artist who promoted a urinal to the status of a masterpiece of the twentieth century. The concept of the readymade attributed to him today is inescapable and still fuels the majority of contemporary creations.
One of the last meetings that bring together his criticism was immeasurable fortune entitled "To each his own Duchamp," testifying in this way that his work is now considered as a Spanish hotel where everyone brings his obsessions. boeing space So there is an alchemist Duchamp, Duchamp, a Christian, an apostle boeing space of Duchamp's sexual liberation, a oulipiano and Pataphysician Duchamp, Duchamp's a fan of popular science in a playful, a follower of Duchamp's laziness on the line by Paul Lafargue ... etc.. His work is therefore designed in order to elicit multiple interpretations and its enigmatic form derives boeing space from this desire to be a sort of dream catchers of all fantasies. What is not false, as we shall see. In fact, Duchamp has actually created the set of its objects, its "things" as he called them, with the aim of causing testosterone critic virtuous but this feature is inscribed in an overall project that is not what d ' an artist but that of an anthropologist who wants to prove scientifically what this rests the famous "judgment of taste" that after Hume and Kant is the object of aesthetic philosophy. Duchamp has mystified the "art world." Or rather, it is the author's first life-size experiment in the history of the human sciences aims to show the sociological laws.
It is said of a work or of a person who is an enigma when the underlying meaning can not be understood in a certain and therefore causes of multiple interpretations, all equally conclusive. Paradoxically, it also defines enigma wit which is to create from scratch a problem that has a solution only verifiable in order to test the intelligence and tenacity of a person. Two very different ways of using this word. The ambiguity, however, is more evident in the first case, where we use the word enigma for free from the obligation to find a permanent solution while the second will be used in reverse to insist on this obligation.
Presented three small drawings like a ball, a Cupid and a hedge of garden boeing space with two children and ask them what they think. The first person who knows of the existence of this wit that is the riddle, tell very quickly "boulanger", second, that does not know at this game you will launch into a digression aesthetics.
- I really like the chubby little angel ... the designer must be a lover of classical art, maybe even a believer ... On the other hand, the circle is a symbol of perfection, this must be the representation of God ...
- Absolutely not - p