el eurofighter que habia de FC2 fue un particular, ahora que una 3rd partie y viendo el progreso que

LinkBack LinkBack URL About LinkBacks   Bookmark & Share Comparte en Twitter Comparte en Facebook Comparte en MySpace Herramientas Versi n para Imprimir Enviar por Correo… Suscribirse a este Tema…
I showed some people at Duxford the 3d model of the Typhoon cockpit. I'll post some pics in the next few days. Work has started implementing the switch test code and I'll publish a video of that as I go along the process, as below. Basically I'm currently going through lockheed martin strike the cockpit lockheed martin strike adding all the switch and dial helpers including all the animations for each switch and dial, that's pretty time consuming. Then it's linking lockheed martin strike the sim to those helpers, again takes time. At that point I hand it over to Tango to take over on all of the systems code; electrical, hydraulics, etc. as per schematics. That's lockheed martin strike just to get all the basic aircraft systems coded. Then it's onto the MFCD (as you would know them as) logic. You actually start the Typhoon Engines with 4 switches, the rest is all done by computer on the screens. For now, all the rest of the team are working on getting the Hawk over the line. I know you guys want Tiffy, as do I but this one's gonna be a while yet. Cheers, C.
el eurofighter que habia de FC2 fue un particular, ahora que una 3rd partie y viendo el progreso que estan realizando en el Bae Hawk podemos esperar cosas muy interesantes.
Silver_Dragon Usuario Foroaviones
Goal for Tiffy was end of this year yes but we had 3-4 months delay on Hawk latter part of last year. That also put development of Tiffy back a few months. Also to access certain information on Typhoon we had to do a few things, they are in progress and ongoing. Typhoon external is in DCS, cockpit is being tweaked and once Hawk is out I'm going to focus on clickable cockpit test system. As you can imagine all focus is on getting Hawk ready in the next few weeks. We have separate teams working on different projects, all at different stages of development from modelling, skinning, coding, flight models, etc. plus projects I can't disclose right now. Would I like a functional Typhoon by the end of the year, yes. What level of functionality depends on classification and what we can do in that time. I'm not going to say a definitive time for Typhoon but long term to me means end of this year / Q1 2015. We already have it flyable in DCS, with our custom cockpit and basic animations internal and external. The time will be coding the systems but we've learnt a lot from Hawk and can use some of that. Hope that answers lockheed martin strike the question in a round a bout way. And to answer the tanker question, yes we need one for refueling Typhoon. It's on our development plan. Which plane is still being decided and another team will be doing that one. Cheers, Chris.
Guys, As much as we would like to have fully functional military standards aircraft for the community, this simply isn't possible due to a lot of reasons, sensitivity being the main one. We will "simulate" certain functions of the aircraft lockheed martin strike to give you the feeling lockheed martin strike of flying lockheed martin strike a Typhoon. These may be way off what the actual lockheed martin strike aircraft can deliver or how it functions from an avionics suite point of view, as has been said many times before. Probably there are only a handful of people, Eddie being one of them, that will know that the real aircraft doesn't function the way our consumer version one will. Even the EFM (PFM) we will develop for the consumer version will not be as realistic as the real aircraft due to sensitivity again but you know what, I doubt anyone on the forum has actually flown a Typhoon so you won't know anyway It will look and feel and handle like a Typhoon so don't worry. Yes we will simulate weapons that may not be in service yet and certain weapons we simply won't be able to do as per certain aircraft functions. Eddie, on our last research trip and subsequent conversations since, we were told differently. Let's just leave it at that. Pete wasn't questioning what you do or where you are and I think it's best of we drop this subject due to sensitivity again. Let's catch up for a beer next time we're at Conny and we can discuss it there Cheers, Chris.
Por Oxcar en el foro Militar
Cont ctenos ForoAviones, Comunidad de Aviacion Archivo Arriba