Rather pilot and manager just did not understand each other. Especially in poor visibility between

German experts call the Sukhoi SuperJet-100 best project of Russian civil aviation industry for the past 20 years. "This is the first since the Soviet collapse completely new development" - emphasizes Editor Patrick Hoveler Flug Revue, which not only saw the new Russian ship, but it flew. "The impression is very good," - said Hoveler.
Russian plane keeps pace with modern Western counterparts, lockheed martin corporate headquarters and in some ways surpasses them, says Hoveler. In particular, he noted the low flush noise and engine efficiency SSJ-100. Deutsche Welle ", Germany
In May 2012, Sukhoi Superjet100 performed first in its history demonstration tour of six Asian countries. May 9 he disappeared while flying around Jakarta. lockheed martin corporate headquarters Yesterday morning wreckage were found in the Mount herring. On board were 48 people - citizens of five countries, including eight Russians, they were employees of the manufacturer of the aircraft - holding "dry". No one survived.
The causes of the tragedy still will transpire. In any case, the "dry" unavoidable adverse effects, the plane is already significant fashion risks, customers probably will ask for discounts. And if you be experiencing technical difficulties, this may result in a review liners for revision and heavy fines.
"Aeroflot", which already operates seven ships, abandon them going, according to a tweet air carrier: "All SSJ undergo daily technical inspection flights lockheed martin corporate headquarters are on schedule." lockheed martin corporate headquarters
Yet at least one customer aircraft - Indonesia has decided to suspend the purchase of SSJ. Indonesian Kartika Airlines was going to buy 30 aircraft SSJ100, first deliveries expected in September. It is possible that the situation will change after finding out the causes of the disaster.
The basic version of the fall: We can only speculate. And the real reason why nobody announce. Is voiced by any reasonable reason not disgrace the technical condition of the aircraft or other countries. So it is the human factor. But there are questions. For now the plane was packed with the latest navigation equipment. Modern navigation equipment gives error in directions no more than 15 meters lockheed martin corporate headquarters in plan and 30-50 meters in height. At such speeds and with such size aircraft is a miser! According to keep the plane in difficult weather conditions possible. Also, the pilot could not know - which area it is located. He could not know the lower limit of the altitude of the area. Nevertheless plane down. So either pilot crazy, navigation devices or mad, or there was a technical failure of the aircraft or the pilot somehow influenced or even forced lockheed martin corporate headquarters ...
So. The basic versions are: 0. blame mountain; 1. The human factor, including neponyatki between pilot and controller; 2. Technical fault navigation devices; 3. Technical fault plane; 4. dishonesty components suppliers; 5. The machinations of competitors; 6. sabotage; 7. Your version.
0. blame mountain "Jakarta problem lockheed martin corporate headquarters is that there are thunderstorms and fog" - said Handverh that he is the captain and flew to the city. He said the difficulty lockheed martin corporate headquarters and terrain: "Go on airfield Jakarta climb high mountains, so you need to be careful." lockheed martin corporate headquarters According to recent reports, Sukhoi SuperJet-100 crashed into a vertical slope herring in the west of the island of Java.
According to the German driver Jörg Handverha fly in Indonesia is also difficult because technical equipment dispatcher service in this Asian country "poor." "Deutsche Welle", Germany
Over 10 years in the mountain crashed: Koreans at Boeing (2002), Afghans Boeing (2005), Pakistanis at Airbus (2010), lockheed martin corporate headquarters Moroccans in Hercules (2011), the Norwegians in Hercules (2012 g .). And that's just large aircraft. Small darkness at all. In all cases, the collision of the mountain lockheed martin corporate headquarters was in poor visibility conditions (rain, fog, sandstorm, clouds).
There are questions: Where only saw dispatchers and navigation equipment? Why demonstration flights made in the highlands, where previously there were several disasters? Why such an experienced lockheed martin corporate headquarters crew did not see the proximity of the mountains? Why do aircraft was turning right on the mountain?
1. The human factor, including neponyatki between pilot and controller: Qualification test pilot Alexander Yablontseva, sitting at the controls Superjet no one in doubt. It was one of the best pilots of the company. It is not clear why he requested permission to decrease to 1,800 meters and dispatcher why not prohibited to do so if the area mountain height of 2000 meters.
Rather pilot and manager just did not understand each other. Especially in poor visibility between the mountains. Most likely cause of the crash is the same as with the Tu-154 in Norway. Manager said one pilot realized otherwise. As a result, crashed lockheed martin corporate headquarters into a mountain, and Russian neftyannykov then had to go there ... <