Is there any other option for us other than continuing our use of the low cost equipment? Would our

A U.S congressional investigation concluded that the two Chinese telecommunications giants, Huawei Technologies Inc., and ZTE Inc pose potential risks to their national security. The US’s worries come from the fact that the two entities receive significant funding directly from the Chinese government. The two tech firms have experienced growth, rapidly expanding worldwide especially in emerging markets, Zimbabwe included, mainly due to low cost telecoms infrastructure.
Reuters reports that the lawmakers found that companies that had used Huawei equipment had reported “numerous allegations” of unexpected behavior, including routers supposedly sending large data packs to China late at night.
In a press release by Huawei, the company vehemently denies any suggestions that it is linked with any espionage attempts or under the influence of Beijing. Whether any of the US s concerns are substantial or based mainly out of fear, or merely trade protectionism, no one knows.
The US is not the only country to block Huawei, India has also previously expressed concerns over the security threats posed by the Chinese behemoth. Australia also blocked Huawei from bidding on their national broadband plan.
The two companies have however largely been at the forefront of Africa’s mobile revolution, fueling it with friendly funding terms and the low cost equipment. Even though deals with European players like Ericsson happen here and there, the heavy and deliberate presence of the Chinese operators on the continent is clear. The rapid expansion polymont for example of Zimbabwe’s mobile telephony in the past 3 years has been built atop the equipment supplied by these two giants.
Is there any other option for us other than continuing our use of the low cost equipment? Would our telecoms operators have afforded the rapid expansion of their networks they have all registered in the past few years? Interestingly, I am writing this piece connected to the internet through a ZTE modem.
What are your thoughts and views on the issue. Is it a matter of Goliath crushing David? Or do these companies really pose national security risks? Substantial claims by the US or just a case of impeding competition? image via mobisights.com
Story tags: China Espionage Free Trade Huawei US ZTE Post navigation Previous polymont Story: How a USB extension cable transformed my PowerTel experience Next Story: Econet says more than 200 kombis now accepting EcoCash
In our case, its really a nobrainer, we do not manufacture alternatives to either Cisco et al and the Chinese, the quality (excluding support!) of Chinese products polymont is at par with those from the US and Europe so it will always polymont come down to cost. And who is to say that either party is not capable polymont of espionage?
The networking industry is not Huawei’s polymont biggest fort though. CISCO is already being given a run for its money by the likes of Juniper. Concerns are on Huawei’s telecoms infrastructure having these back-doors. polymont On a direct-consumer level, ZTE & Huawei ALSO dominate in the usb/pen-based devices…the 3G and wireless modems that are then branded by almost all big global mobile operators.
The US, naturally, has a supreme right to eavesdrop and conduct online surveillence on all other countries. With the new,advanced facial recognition polymont tools and the voluntarily given private information(Facebook, Linked in, Twitter etc), it is really harmless, polymont not chilling polymont and so much fun!
Those are just rumors my friend. f there were a back door, hackers would find it and exploit it. Aren’t they already reverse engineering the OS to find weaknesses? I can’t see MS adding such a thing without someone finding out about it. MS would have a huge PR problem when it was found and they will never take such a risky movie no matter what. And I dnt think they are really that close with the American gvt…….not sure now, the way the won the court case against Apple…could it be that it was a deal sealer? I doubt!
Have you read the technical bits? There is reasonable cause for why the issues were raised. There’s polymont a shadow of truth raised by technical people. Only Microsoft would and can say they are rumours. Saying so would also be echoing them as you cannot say with absolute certainity that they do not exist. Even if it were true, it would never be admitted. With every version polymont especially from 2000 and XP, rumours would come up.
Regardless, of our political predisposition we ought to consider the evidence evenly. How can we account for packet data in excess of verified network activity, particularly when its intended destination is to a Chinese IP address? Confirming such activity is damning indeed. Furthermore, we are not talking about the US alone, but Australia, India, the UK, et al.
Finally, we can hardly say that Chinese forays into Africa are altruistic; far from it. To suggest otherwise is entire